Skip to main content
GCGlobalsConflicts
EN DE

Report

Rosstat hack: data obtained suggests over 390,000 Russian deaths in Ukraine war

Brief with source link and editorial boundary.

Source published: 8 Nov 2026, 18:04 CET Publication time from the source RSS/feed

Ukraine/Russia · Private media

Rosstat hack: data obtained suggests over 390,000 Russian deaths in Ukraine war

Hacker groups Cyberpartisans BY and Silent Crow say they hacked Rosstat and counted Russian losses since the invasion of Ukraine. Their tally: between 393,000 and 450,000 killed.

Source published
8 Nov 2026, 18:04 CET
Publication time from the source RSS/feed
Captured by GC
9 Nov 2026, 17:37 CET
When GlobalsConflicts first captured this item.
Source
Euronews - News
Trust
medium · direct source trail
Source quality
usable
direct source; further independent sources matter for hard confidence
Actors
Ukraine, UN, OCHA
Brief

Hacker groups Cyberpartisans BY and Silent Crow say they hacked Rosstat and counted Russian losses since the invasion of Ukraine. Their tally: between 393,000 and 450,000 killed.

medium direct source trail The evidence trail is rated, not absolute truth.
Part of a developing story 14 sources, 16 reports See the full timeline →

What is reported

Hacker groups Cyberpartisans BY and Silent Crow say they hacked Rosstat and counted Russian losses since the invasion of Ukraine. Their tally: between 393,000 and 450,000 killed.

Visible evidence

  • Source published (RSS): 8 Nov 2026, 18:04 CET. Publication time from the source RSS/feed
  • The report is assigned to the Ukraine/Russia dossier.
  • The visible source is Euronews - News.

Still unclear

  • 1 direct report nearby, but not automatically the same core claim.
  • 5 related reports in the same dossier may add context.
  • The page rates the evidence trail, not the political truth of a position.

Why it matters

This report is assigned to the Ukraine/Russia dossier. It matters because it adds a concrete new trail in the current source window. The brief uses 5 sources in the surrounding context while keeping timestamp, publisher and original URL visible.

Trust assessment

Direct source with related reports nearby. The evidence trail is usable, but should not be read as a fully confirmed situation yet.

Editorial boundary

Still open: whether further independent sources confirm, correct or merely repeat the same development. The trust level describes the source trail, not absolute truth.

Related reports

Archive