Globals Conflicts — sources before slogans. Conflict coverage fails when it starts with a jersey colour.

Red line: Map graphics that imply precision we don’t have.

War isn’t a jersey colour—it's logistics, law, and who gets cited.

Example: same city, two maps—without timestamps you’re comparing movies, not reality.

What hits the timeline first

Satellite imagery is powerful and easy to mis-caption.

What should arrive with it (evidence)

Ceasefires get announced and broken—timestamps matter.

Known unknowns

Treating OSINT hobby threads as verified battle results.

Frontline vs feed

The line moves faster than your scroll—without date and source, a map is mood, not fact.

Evidence is often ugly: contradictory, patchy—still, it’s the only thing that counts.

If the timeline is faster than sourcing, read how we timestamp claims and what we won’t assert for engagement.

How we work

Small edits are normal; material corrections get noted. Sponsorship cannot buy conclusions—when in doubt, we cut the sentence.