Global Security · Public broadcaster
BRICS: What is in the joint statement from the 11 members?
The New Delhi BRICS summit shows how Russia's war in Ukraine is increasingly embedded in a wider dispute over the international order. France 24 reports that the 11 members overcame internal divisions to issue a joint statement. Russia, China, India and Iran are using the forum alongside other emerging powers to emphasize diplomacy and challenge Western-led sanctions and power structures.
- Source published
- 12 Sept 2026, 17:45 CEST
Publication time from the source RSS/feed - Captured by GC
- 12 Sept 2026, 18:31 CEST
When GlobalsConflicts first captured this item. - Source
- France 24 - English
- Trust
- medium · direct source trail
- Source quality
- good
public broadcaster or established media source from a direct trail - Actors
- Russia, India, France, Iran, China, Israel
The New Delhi BRICS summit shows how Russia's war in Ukraine is increasingly embedded in a wider dispute over the international order. France 24 reports that the 11 members overcame internal divisions to issue a joint statement. Russia, China, India and Iran are using the forum alongside other emerging powers to emphasize diplomacy and challenge Western-led sanctions and power structures.
What is reported
Members of the 11-nation BRICS group including China, Russia, Iran and India called for calm in the Middle East at a summit in New Delhi on Saturday, overcoming earlier divisions to issue a joint statement. Chinese President Xi Jinping, who joined Russian, Iranian, Indian and other leaders in India's capital, told the summit that the Middle East war "does not serve the common interests of the international community". France 24's Andrew Hilliar tells us more.
Visible evidence
- Source published (RSS): 12 Sept 2026, 17:45 CEST. Publication time from the source RSS/feed
- The report is assigned to the Global Security dossier.
- The visible source is France 24 - English.
Still unclear
- 5 direct reports nearby, but not automatically the same core claim.
- 5 related reports in the same dossier may add context.
- The page rates the evidence trail, not the political truth of a position.
Why it matters
This report is assigned to the Global Security dossier. It matters because it adds a concrete new trail in the current source window. The brief uses 4 sources in the surrounding context while keeping timestamp, publisher and original URL visible.
Trust assessment
Public broadcaster or established direct source. The report remains medium until an independent second trail visibly supports the same core claim.
Editorial boundary
Still open: whether further independent sources confirm, correct or merely repeat the same development. The trust level describes the source trail, not absolute truth.